Our core principle: evidence, not rulings
We are not an Islamic authority, and we do not issue fatwas. For every question, we research what recognized halal certifiers, established fatwa bodies, and primary sources actually say, summarize it plainly, and link the original so you can check it yourself. The verdict we show is a summary of that evidence — the decision is yours.
We show where the schools differ (multi-madhhab)
Many ingredients have more than one legitimate answer depending on the school of law (madhhab) you follow — seafood like shrimp and squid, gelatin and the transformation (istihala) debate, trace fermentation alcohol in soy sauce and vinegar. We deliberately do not flatten these into a single ruling. Instead we lay out the Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki and Hanbali positions where they diverge, note the mainstream and minority views, and let you apply your own.
This is why we don’t “standardize” on one certifier’s framework: doing so would hide real, valid differences of scholarship. Transparency about the range of recognized opinion is the more honest signal.
The sources we cite
Every answer links its own sources. Across the hub, the recognized bodies we rely on include:
Halal certifiers & standards
- IFANCA — Islamic Food and Nutrition Council of America (US)
- SANHA — South African National Halaal Authority
- JAKIM — Department of Islamic Development Malaysia
- MUI / LPPOM — Indonesian Ulema Council — halal certification body
- HFA / HMC — Halal Food Authority & Halal Monitoring Committee (UK)
- American Halal Foundation — US halal certifier & ingredient reference
Fatwa & scholarly bodies
- IslamQA.info — Shaykh Muhammad Salih al-Munajjid
- Darul Iftaa Birmingham — UK Hanafi fatwa body
- Darul Fiqh / Darul Uloom (Deoband, Trinidad) — Hanafi seminaries & iftaa
- SeekersGuidance — Cross-madhhab answers (Hanafi & Shafi’i)
- AMJA — Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America
- OIC Islamic Fiqh Academy — International collective-ijtihad body
Primary & verifying sources
- Official brand & manufacturer pages — What the maker itself states about ingredients
- Regulators (e.g. FDA) — Additive approvals, bans and definitions
- Fact-checkers (Africa Check, Snopes) — To debunk viral ingredient hoaxes
- Qur’an & hadith references — For the underlying textual basis
Our source-quality rules
- We cite only real, checkable sources — a working link to a recognized authority, a manufacturer’s own statement, a regulator, or a Qur’an/hadith reference.
- We never fabricate scholar quotes, certifications, or fatwas, and we don’t claim a product is certified unless a real certificate exists.
- When a claim is a viral rumor (for example the “E211 is made from pig fat” hoax), we say so and cite the fact-check, rather than repeating it.
- Where honest scholarship disagrees, we present both the majority and the minority view rather than pick a side.
How we keep answers current
Formulations, suppliers and restaurant practices change. Each answer shows an “Evidence last checked” date, and every answer is manually reviewed before it is published — we do not auto-generate or bulk-publish. When a brand reformulates or a certification changes, we revisit the affected answer and update its date. If you spot something out of date, tell us.
What this hub is — and isn't
The “Is it halal?” hub answers questions about chains, ingredients, brands, foods and drinks using cited evidence. It is separate from our restaurant verification methodology, which explains how we verify individual Houston restaurants (evidence weights, tiers, and confidence scores). Both share the same rule: we present evidence and its freshness, and we never claim religious certainty.